- 8 - not properly includable in the 1994 tax year because he did not purchase any "stocks or bonds" until 1997.9 In this case, petitioner does not contest the amount of income received from bond interest. Petitioner's sole contention is that the interest income was not includable in income for the 1994 tax year because he "thinks" that he did not purchase or own any stocks or bonds until 1997. Petitioner offered to provide documentation of his contention to this Court, but failed to do so. Upon the basis of the record, we find that petitioner received $50 in gross income from A.G. Edwards for the 1994 tax year. Respondent is sustained on this issue. 3. Head-of-Household Status Petitioner contends that his correct filing status is head of household. Petitioner testified that his 13-year-old son lived with him for the entire taxable year, and both parties have stipulated that petitioner was unmarried at all times during 1994. Section 2(b) defines a head of household, in pertinent part, as an individual who is not married as of the end of the tax year and who maintains as his home a household which constitutes for more than one-half of such taxable year the principal place of abode of an unmarried son as a member of that household. 9 Petitioner included the $50 in the $16,495 amount reported on line 7 as Wages, salaries, tips, etc., on his 1994 income tax return.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011