-20- Petitioner argues that the income against which we apply the section 280A(c)(5) limitation is the gross income from the Broadmoor Gardens and farm activity as a whole. We disagree. Section 280A(c)(5) specifically limits the taxpayer's deduction for business use of a residence to the amount of income derived from the business use of the residence. Petitioner contends that she earned $1,100 from tour tickets in 1990. However, she reported no ticket income on her 1990 return, and Broadmoor Gardens did not open until 1993. Thus, we conclude that petitioner had no income from business use of her residence in 1990 and 1991, and that she may not deduct depreciation related to her residence for 1990 and 1991. See sec. 280A(c)(5)(A).4 The result would not differ even if we considered all of the income from petitioner's farm and garden activity. That is because, under section 280A(c)(5)(B)(ii), we would consider only income in excess of expenses. Petitioner had large losses from her farm and garden activity in the years at issue. 4 To the extent deductions are disallowed under sec. 280A(c)(5), they may be carried forward to the succeeding taxable year. See sec. 280A(c)(5), flush language. Sec. 168(e)(3)(D) provides a 10-year period for depreciation for single purpose horticultural structures as defined by sec. 168(i)(13)(B)(ii). Petitioner contends that the conservatory is a single purpose horticultural structure. Petitioner also contends that she used the conservatory exclusively for business. Based on our holding that petitioner may not depreciate any costs of the conservatory in 1990 and 1991, we need not decide whether petitioner used the conservatory exclusively for business in 1990 and 1991 or whether the conservatory was a single purpose horticultural structure under sec. 168(i)(13)(B)(ii).Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011