Paul Trans and Thuy Bich Dang - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

               Taking property subject to a mortgage means that the buyer             
               pays the seller for the latter's redemption interest, i.e.,            
               the difference between the amount of the mortgage debt and             
               the total amount for which the property is being sold, but             
               the buyer does not assume a personal obligation to pay the             
               mortgage debt.  The buyer agrees that as between him and the           
               seller, the latter has no obligation to satisfy the mortgage           
               debt, and that the debt is to be satisfied out of the                  
               property.  Although he is not obliged to, the buyer will               
               ordinarily make the payments on the mortgage debt in order             
               to protect his interest in the property.                               
          See also Voight v. Commissioner, 68 T.C. 99 (1977), affd. per               
          curiam 614 F.2d 94 (5th Cir. 1986); Andrews v. Robertson, 170 P.            
          1129 (Cal. 1918); Wolfert v. Guadagno, 20 P.2d 360 (Cal. Dist.              
          Ct. App. 1933); Osborne, Handbook on the Law of Mortgages, sec.             
          252 (2d ed. 1970).  The facts as established in this record are             
          consistent with petitioners’ having transferred the Danville                
          property to Haq subject to petitioners’ mortgage on the                     
          property.6                                                                  
               Petitioners direct us to other irregularities and                      
          unexplained circumstances regarding the Danville property,                  
          including delays in the recording of the grant deed and of                  
          various other documents, and the declaration of a presumptively             
          too-small amount of transfer tax on the grant deed conveying the            


               6 For instance, included in the record as petitioners’                 
          exhibit 55 is a memorandum from Prudential Home Mortgage Co. to a           
          representative of Haq with regard to a mortgage on the Danville             
          property.  The memorandum identifies petitioner husband as the              
          mortgagor.  The memorandum advises Haq’s representative that                
          Prudential Home Mortgage Co. has paid delinquent taxes on the               
          Danville property and seeks, inter alia, reimbursement from Haq’s           
          representative in order to release the property from foreclosure.           
          Such a communication to Haq’s representative would be consistent            
          with petitioners’ having transferred the property to Haq subject            
          to the mortgage.                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011