- 8 -
after requesting that notices be sent to him. He has not shown
that any other notices were created and/or were not sent to him
in error after his 1996 request for notice.
Because the claim for abatement was not cognizable, there
was no abuse of discretion in respondent’s denial of petitioner’s
request for interest abatement.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered for
respondent.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011