William Clovis Williams - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               In Williams v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 1997-145,            
          this Court addressed petitioner's various arguments.  We decided            
          the same issue which is before us in this case in favor of                  
          respondent with respect to petitioner's 1993 taxable year.  We              
          there held:                                                                 
                    Although the income petitioner derived from his                   
               handyman business may have enabled him to sustain his                  
               ministry at Moss Bluff Church of Christ and to fulfill                 
               the obligation of supporting his family, those reasons                 
               or motives do not cause the handyman business to be                    
               integral to the conduct of his ministry.  Petitioner                   
               failed to show that his self-employment income from the                
               handyman business was earned "with respect to services                 
               performed by him as * * *  [a] minister", as required                  
               by section 1402(e).                                                    
                         *     *     *     *     *     *     *                        
               Petitioner failed to present evidence to show that the                 
               tenets or teachings of the Moss Bluff Church of Christ                 
               are opposed to private or public insurance programs.                   
               Petitioner further failed to show that he is a member                  
               of any other recognized religious sect, or division                    
               thereof, whose tenets or teachings oppose the                          
               acceptance of private or public insurance benefits.                    
               Moreover, petitioner failed to produce any evidence                    
               that he completed and filed a Form 4029 with the IRS,                  
               as required by the regulations, to qualify for an                      
               exemption from self-employment tax under section                       
               1402(g).                                                               
               We find that this case is factually indistinguishable from             
          Williams v. Commissioner, supra.  There has been no change in the           
          applicable law, and petitioner has not presented any additional             
          arguments.  Accordingly, under the doctrine of collateral                   
          estoppel, we hold that petitioner's earnings from his handyman              
          business are subject to self-employment tax under section 1401.             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011