- 11 - proceeding in which the Government is seeking to collect its delinquent taxes or file a claim therefor." Respondent does not argue that decedent made an involuntary payment in this case. In the same vein, if a taxpayer makes a voluntary payment without directing application of funds, the IRS may make whatever allocation it chooses. See Estate of Baumgardner v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 445, 459 (1985). However, where a taxpayer makes voluntary payments to the IRS, he does have a right to direct the application of payments to whatever type of liability he chooses. See Muntwyler v. United States, 703 F.2d 1030, 1032 (7th Cir. 1983); Estate of Baumgardner v. Commissioner, supra at 459-460. Having postulated the foregoing principles, we must now decide whether decedent did, in fact, designate the December 31, 1986, remittance as a payment of her 1980 income tax--i.e., the type of liability decedent chose--and if so, whether respondent was free on July 13, 1992, to reallocate some of the 1986 payment, i.e., $32,597 thereof, to assessments for other years, one of which--1989--was 3 years in the future at the time decedent made her 1986 payment. We are satisfied that decedent designated her entire voluntary payment as a payment of income tax and interest for 1980. A transcript of decedent's IRS account for 1980 reflects, under date of 12/31/86, as a "Subsequent Payment" the amount ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011