ABC Rentals of San Antonio, Inc., et al. - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          88 T.C. 1329, 1334 (1987); DeVenney v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 927,           
          930 (1985).                                                                 
               The Commissioner’s position can be justified even if                   
          ultimately rejected by the Court.  See Wilfong v. United States,            
          991 F.2d 359, 364 (7th Cir. 1993).  The fact that the                       
          Commissioner eventually loses on the merits or concedes a case is           
          not determinative of whether a taxpayer is entitled to reasonable           
          litigation and administrative costs.  See Sokol v. Commissioner,            
          92 T.C. 760, 767 (1989).                                                    
               We now consider whether respondent’s position was                      
          substantially justified.  We must look at all facts and                     
          circumstances as well as the legal precedents relating to the               
          case, bearing in mind that petitioners bear the burden of proof.            
          See Coastal Petroleum Refiners, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at              
          694-695.  The issues for decision in the underlying case                    
          pertained to the use of the income forecast method of                       
          depreciation for rental units utilized in rent-to-own businesses.           
          Respondent’s position in the notice of deficiency was that the              
          income forecast method of depreciation was not an approved method           
          for depreciating assets other than television films, taped shows            
          for reproduction of motion picture films, sound recordings, and             
          other property of similar character.  Respondent further contends           
          in the notice of deficiency that the rental units on which                  
          petitioners have used the income forecast method of depreciation            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011