- 2 - Five of the seven petitioners in these seven consolidated cases have raised the affirmative defense of statute of limitations. Those five petitioners argue that the notices of final partnership administrative adjustment in question were not timely because they were issued after expiration of the sec. 6229(a), I.R.C., assessment period. Held: In all five cases, either a valid Form 872- P, Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax Attributable to Items of a Partnership, was signed by the tax matters partner or another person authorized in writing by the partnership to enter into such an agreement, or no valid partnership return was filed that would fix the time to assess tax under sec. 6229(a), I.R.C. Steven Mather and Kenneth Barish, for petitioners. William H. Quealy, Jr., Alice M. Harbutte, Henry T. Schafer, Guy Glaser, Laurel Robinson, and Ann Durning, for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011