Allen Family Foods, Inc. - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          distributions and/or shareholder contributions in this context              
          constitute subchapter S items pursuant to section 301.6245-                 
          1T(a)(5), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 3003               
          (Jan. 30, 1987).                                                            
               On the other hand, the parties disagree whether the above-             
          quoted regulations expand the scope of the term "subchapter S               
          item" to encompass the determinations regarding shareholder basis           
          that petitioners seek to place in dispute in these cases.                   
          Petitioners contend that, inasmuch as constructive corporate                
          distributions and/or shareholder contributions are considered               
          subchapter S items, the Court's jurisdiction encompasses the                
          legal question whether such constructive corporate distributions            
          and/or shareholder contributions will result in adjustments to              
          the shareholders' bases in their stockholdings.  Petitioners rely           
          on the flush language of section 301.6245-1T(c)(2), Temporary               
          Proced. & Admin. Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 3004 (Jan. 30, 1987), and              
          Dakotah Hills Offices Ltd. Partnership v. Commissioner, T.C.                
          Memo. 1996-35, in support of their position.  Respondent counters           
          that the Court's holding in Dial, Inc. v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 1           
          (1990), is controlling, and that the matters relating to                    
          shareholder basis that petitioners are attempting to place in               
          dispute do not constitute subchapter S items.                               
               Our review of the allegations in the petitions that                    
          respondent finds objectionable reveals that petitioners in fact             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011