- 15 - We agree with respondent’s contention that the payments to petitioner were received by petitioner in her role as a care provider to Mr. Baldwin and that she was required to provide attendant and nursing care in order to receive the payments as compensation for services rendered to Mr. Baldwin. Although we are sympathetic with petitioner’s circumstances, we are constrained by the Michigan statute and pertinent caselaw in defining petitioner’s income for attendant-care services to her husband as compensation. The payments are therefore includable in petitioner’s gross income for the years in issue as compensation for the attendant and nursing care services she provided to Mr. Baldwin. Upon the basis of the record, we therefore hold that the payments to petitioner from Healthcare are includable in her gross income for the years in issue. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011