Kenneth Andrew Baratelle - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          at trial that he did not use these items exclusively for business           
          purposes.  Section 1.179-1(d)(1), Income Tax Regs., provides that           
          a section 179 expense deduction may be claimed only for the                 
          portion of the cost attributable to business use and that no such           
          deduction is allowed if the business use is less than 50 percent.           
          Petitioner claims that he used, and intended to use, the                    
          television and the VCR to make tapes, but he failed to show how             
          much this equipment was used for business.  Consequently,                   
          petitioner has not established that he is entitled to a deduction           
          for the cost of these items under section 179.  Respondent                  
          conceded, however, that petitioner is entitled to a depreciation            
          deduction of $40 with respect to these items (basis--$1,377,                
          salvage--$377, business use--20 percent, useful life--5 years).             
               Petitioner also claimed a section 179 deduction for payments           
          to Cerritos Trophy, Matt’s Glass & Mirror, Van Hygan & Smith,               
          Aaron Brothers, and Bradex totaling $2,817.96.  Petitioner                  
          contends these payments were for 25 decorative plates,                      
          identification plaques and frames for the plates, and a glass               
          case to hold the plates.  Respondent contends that petitioner has           
          failed to demonstrate any business use for these items and that             
          petitioner’s claimed deduction for their cost should not be                 
          allowed.  We agree that petitioner was required to substantiate             
          the business use of these items and that petitioner failed to do            
          so.                                                                         






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011