James D. Barber and Betty L. Barber - Page 28




                                       - 28 -                                         
          Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L. 97-248, sec. 402(a),            
          96 Stat. 648.  On May 30, 1989, respondent mailed a Notice of               
          Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment (FPAA) to Sam Winer,            
          the tax matters partner of the Whitman partnership, for each of             
          the taxable years 1982 and 1983.12  A copy of each FPAA was also            
          mailed to petitioners.                                                      
               The FPAA’s advised petitioners of adjustments respondent               
          proposed to make to the partnership returns (Forms 1065) filed by           
          Whitman.  Specifically, the FPAA’s disallowed all deductions and            
          credits claimed by Whitman in connection with its plastics                  
          recycling activities for 1982 and 1983.13                                   
               On June 22, 1989, a case was commenced in this Court at                
          docket No. 14535-89 and captioned “Whitman Recycling Associates,            
          Sam Winer, Tax Matters Partner, Petitioner v. Commissioner of the           



               12  Respondent also mailed FPAA’s to Winer for the taxable             
          years 1984 and 1985, which years were also in issue as part of              
          the partnership action described infra in the text.                         
               13  In October 1988, some 7 months before respondent mailed            
          the FPAA’s, respondent made the so-called Plastics Recycling                
          Project Settlement Offer (the settlement offer).  The settlement            
          offer was made in writing to Winer as Whitman’s tax matters                 
          partner.  The terms of the settlement offer are described in                
          detail in section “I” of the Background portion of Davenport                
          Recycling Associates v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-347, affd.            
          220 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2000).  Suffice it to say that the                 
          transmittal letter stated that the settlement offer would not be            
          repeated and that the offer would expire 30 days from the date of           
          the letter.  Winer did not accept the settlement offer on behalf            
          of the partnership.  Accordingly, respondent mailed the FPAA’s              
          that are described above in the text.                                       





Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011