- 2 - 2. Whether petitioners may deduct as a casualty loss for 1994 the cost of improving and restoring their pond and its surrounding grounds. We hold that they may not. 3. Whether petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for 1994. We hold that they are. The parties agree that, to the extent that we sustain respondent’s determinations increasing petitioners’ income shown on Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, a computational adjustment is required for petitioners’ self-employment tax for 1994. Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code. References to petitioner are to Marvin L. Barmes. References to Mrs. Barmes are to petitioner Barbara J. Barmes. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. A. Petitioners Petitioners lived in Fritchton, Indiana (the Fritchton residence), when they filed their petition. The Fritchton residence is located on 17.73 acres of land (the Fritchton property). Petitioners acquired the Fritchton residence and property in 1978. There is an old farmhouse located near petitioners’ residence on the Fritchton property. Mrs. Barmes’ mother livedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011