- 4 -
also sent a letter to her supervisor, in response to an
unfavorable performance review, which included the following
language:
Your memo asks for action plans on meeting your
expectations, I don’t feel this is possible. Whatever
your reasons are, as you have stated your [sic] not
sure a woman could ever do this job as well as a man.
* * * This entire process has been an ongoing
harrassment [sic] without constructive consequences. I
want to know what alternatives if any are open to me.
I feel that for the past twenty years that [I] have
done a good job wherever I have worked. I like my job
I have now, but do not feel this continued and
unjustified intimidation can or should be tolerated.
* * *
Petitioner further asserts that she told the Equal Employment
Opportunity Consultant that she was going to bring a lawsuit
against the company, but she did not at any time file suit
against PSC on the basis of gender discrimination or other
claims.
Petitioner additionally suffered physical problems during
the period she was employed as a field supervisor. She was
hospitalized three times, for chest pain, pneumonia, and
abdominal pain, respectively, and she experienced continuing
difficulty with breathing and asthma. Petitioner attributes
these ailments to work-related stress and maintains that the
problems ceased after she left PSC.
In 1994, as part of a corporate reorganization in which
unnecessary positions were eliminated, eligible PSC employees
were offered an opportunity to participate in an Enhanced
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011