- 19 - 1986 1987 1988 Briggs $581 $87,106 $210,142 The Morrises 581 1,106 199,490 For each of the taxable years 1986, 1987, and 1988, petitioners each claimed, and respondent disallowed, pass-through losses from Towers Development in excess of the basis amounts stated above. Discussion The question, as framed by the parties, is whether, for purposes of determining the pro rata shares of Towers Development losses that petitioners may take into account under section 1366(d), petitioners had bases in their Towers Development stock attributable to the construction loans that AMI made directly to Towers Development. Relying on Selfe v. United States, 778 F.2d 769, 772 (11th Cir. 1985), petitioners argue that because they were personally liable with respect to these construction loans, guaranteed them, and pledged certain assets to AMI, their bases in their Towers Development stock should include allocable shares of these construction loans. Disputing petitioners’ factual premises and distinguishing Selfe on its facts, respondent argues that because petitioners made no economic outlays with regard to these construction loans, they are entitled to no increased bases therefrom. An S corporation shareholder generally must take into account a pro rata share of the corporation’s income, losses, andPage: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011