Douglas T. Busby & Valarie E. Busby - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          whether the notice was mailed to his last known address.  For the           
          following reasons, we find that it was.                                     
               Having determined a deficiency in petitioners’ 1996 Federal            
          income tax, respondent was authorized to send by certified or               
          registered mail a notice of deficiency to petitioners at their              
          “last known address”.  Sec. 6212(a) and (b).  Petitioners filed a           
          joint Federal income tax return for 1996.  Section 6212(b)(2)               
          states that: “In the case of a joint income tax return filed by             
          husband and wife, such notice of deficiency may be a single joint           
          notice, except that if the Secretary has been notified by either            
          spouse that separate residences have been established, then, in             
          lieu of the single joint notice, a duplicate original of the                
          joint notice shall be sent by certified mail or registered mail             
          to each spouse at his last known address.” (Emphasis added.)                
          Petitioners do not contend, and nothing in the record                       
          demonstrates, that either of them notified respondent that they             
          had established separate residences.                                        
               In general, a taxpayer’s last known address is the address             
          shown on the most recently filed return, absent clear and concise           
          notice of a change in address.  See King v. Commissioner, 857               
          F.2d 676, 679 (9th Cir. 1988), affg. 88 T.C. 1042 (1987); Abeles            
          v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 1019, 1035 (1988).                                 
               In this case, the notice was not mailed to petitioners at              
          the address listed on their most recently filed joint return.               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011