- 10 - of revenues is wagers placed on horse races. In determining whether the expenses in question are entertainment expenses petitioners’ trade or business must be considered. We would agree petitioners are in the entertainment business. However, applying the objective test mandated by section 1.274-2(b)(1)(ii), Income Tax Regs., the Derby, Breeders’ Cup, and miscellaneous expenses all constitute entertainment expenses and cannot be properly categorized as “part of the entertainment product”. Thus the Derby, Breeders’ Cup, and miscellaneous expenses are subject to the restrictions imposed by section 274(n)(1) unless they fall within one of the exceptions set out in section 274(n)(2). Petitioners alternatively argue that the Derby, Breeders’ Cup, and miscellaneous expenses are excluded from the operation of section 274(n)(1) by paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 274(e). Those paragraphs provide as follows: (7) Items available to public.--Expenses for goods, services, and facilities made available by the taxpayer to the general public. (8) Entertainment sold to customers.--Expenses for goods or services (including the use of facilities) which are sold by the taxpayer in a bona fide transaction for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth. Petitioners provide entertainment to all of the public through their different events. The Kentucky Derby and the Breeders’ Cup Championship are open to the general public as are other races during Derby Week and Breeders’ Cup week. InPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011