William A. and Gayle T. Cook, Donors - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          designation as the successor annuitant, then the terms of the               
          trust agreement are to be applied as if the spouse had                      
          predeceased the grantor.                                                    
               Petitioners’ Gift Tax Returns                                          
               Each petitioner timely filed a Federal gift tax return for             
          the taxable years 1993 and 1995.  Each petitioner reported the              
          value of the transfers to their respective GRAT’s by subtracting            
          from the value of the transferred property the value of an                  
          annuity based on two lives successively; i.e., the value of a               
          stream of fixed annual payments for the shorter of either a term            
          of years (5 years for both of the 1993 GRAT’s and Mrs. Cook’s               
          1995 GRAT, and 3 years for Mr. Cook’s 1995 GRAT) or a period                
          ending upon the death of the last to die of the grantor and the             
          grantor’s spouse.                                                           
               The Notices of Deficiency                                              
               Respondent issued notices of deficiency to Mrs. Cook for the           
          taxable years 1993 and 1995 determining deficiencies in Federal             
          gift taxes in the amounts of $2,789,609 and $4,850,271,                     
          respectively.  Respondent issued notices of deficiency to Mr.               
          Cook for the taxable years 1993 and 1995 determining deficiencies           
          in Federal gift taxes in the amounts of $3,271,125 and                      
          $4,446,282, respectively.  A portion of the deficiency for each             
          year and for each petitioner is attributable to respondent’s                
          analysis of the retained annuity in each trust, and a                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011