Raymond P. Corkrey and Megan B. Flom-Corkrey - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          part and revd. in part 43 F.3d 172 (5th Cir. 1995); Dartmouth               
          Clubs, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-167.                           
               Petitioner seeks recovery of administrative costs associated           
          with the preparation of his returns by his accountant as well as            
          costs attributable to his attorney's attempts to correct                    
          deficiencies in the delinquently filed returns.  However,                   
          petitioner failed to file timely a required tax return for 1987,            
          even though his gross income exceeded the filing requirement.               
          The information the Service received from the SSA showed that               
          petitioner owed substantial tax.  Petitioner had not presented              
          all relevant information under his control to the appropriate               
          Service personnel prior to his filing the required return.  Even            
          when petitioner did file his return, he still had not presented             
          all relevant information to allow Ms. Meuse to process his return           
          because petitioner's ex-wife had not signed a declaration that              
          petitioner's 1987 return was true and accurate.  See sec.                   
          301.7430-5(h), Example (3), Proced. & Admin. Regs.                          
               Petitioners contend that the Service is not substantially              
          justified if the erroneous assessment is predicated upon a                  
          disputed "information return."  Petitioners rely on Cole v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-375.  The taxpayer in Cole filed a            
          timely 1991 return reporting $2,427.25 of other income.  The                
          Service's information showed that she had been paid $4,147.50.              
          After the Service issued a 30-day letter, the taxpayer informed             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011