- 2 - 280. The sole issue for decision is whether respondent abused his discretion by denying petitioner’s request to abate interest. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. Petitioner resided in Las Vegas, Nevada, at the time he filed his petition. For the year 1992, petitioner worked as a bartender at the Las Vegas Hilton and conducted an auto sales business. Petitioner filed his 1992 Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, on May 24, 1993. Petitioner reported a business loss of $16,504 related to auto sales for his business “Whole Sale Auto”. On September 12, 1994, respondent notified petitioner in writing that his 1992 Federal income tax return had been selected for examination and requested that petitioner arrange an appointment and produce records substantiating his tip income and certain items from his Schedule C, Profit and Loss From Business. On November 14, 1994, petitioner provided respondent with his tip diary but did not provide any information supporting his Schedule C. On November 23, 1994, respondent notified petitioner of proposed changes to his 1992 return. The proposed changes 1(...continued) 206, secs. 3305(a), 3309(a), 112 Stat. 685, 743, 745. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011