Anthony S. D'Acquisto - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          for a number of employers during a tax year does not necessitate            
          treatment as an independent contractor.                                     
               The case before us is a factual one.  Petitioner’s failure             
          to have corrected Forms W-2 issued to him and failure to pay                
          self-employment tax under petitioner’s own theory militates                 
          against his case before us.  Moreover, without the contracts                
          before us, we cannot find that their provisions corroborate                 
          petitioner’s claim that he was an independent contractor.  In               
          sum, petitioner did not demonstrate that he is entitled to                  
          treatment as an independent contractor.  Consequently, we find              
          that petitioner was an employee for the 1994 taxable year and is            
          therefore not entitled to claim business expense deductions on              
          Schedule C for the year in issue.                                           
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        for respondent.                               




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011