Harvey J. Davis and Patricia A. Davis - Page 29





                                       - 29 -                                         
          petitioners' activity, we find that petitioners engaged in their            
          Arabian horse activity for profit in the years in issue.  Our               
          holding should not be taken to mean that petitioners would                  
          prevail in any later year without further changes in their                  
          operating methods or results.                                               
          C.   Whether Petitioners Are Liable for the Penalty Under Section           
               6662 for Substantial Understatement                                    
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for the              
          accuracy-related penalty for substantial understatement for 1994,           
          1995, and 1996 under section 6662.                                          
               Based on our holding that petitioners operated their Arabian           
          horse activity for profit, petitioners are not liable for the               
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662.                                

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          






















Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  

Last modified: May 25, 2011