Robert Patrick Day - Page 21




                                       - 21 -                                         
          required Federal employment tax returns on a basis consistent               
          with this treatment.  Petitioner never treated the drivers as               
          employees and consistently issued them Forms 1099.  Therefore,              
          the threshold requirement petitioner must satisfy to qualify for            
          section 530 relief is that he had a reasonable basis for treating           
          the drivers as nonemployees.                                                
               Section 530(a)(2) provides that reasonable reliance on any             
          of three "safe harbors" shall be treated as a reasonable basis              
          for not treating a worker as an employee.  See Boles Trucking,              
          Inc. v. United States, supra.  Paragraph (2) provides:                      
               For purposes of paragraph (1), a taxpayer shall in any                 
               case be treated as having a reasonable basis for not                   
               treating an individual as an employee for a period if                  
               the taxpayer's treatment of such individual for such                   
               period was in reasonable reliance on any of the                        
               following:                                                             
                         (A) judicial precedent, published rulings,                   
                    technical advice with respect to the taxpayer, or                 
                    a letter ruling to the taxpayer;                                  
                         (B) a past Internal Revenue Service audit of                 
                    the taxpayer in which there was no assessment                     
                    attributable to the treatment (for employment tax                 
                    purposes) of the individuals holding positions                    
                    substantially similar to the position held by this                
                    individual; or                                                    
                         (C) long-standing recognized practice of a                   
                    significant segment of the industry in which the                  
                    individual was engaged.                                           
               Petitioner provided no evidence that he had a reasonable               
          reliance on any of these safe harbor provisions.  Respondent                
          called as witnesses five of petitioner's former drivers, all of             
          whom were employed as truck drivers at other times for other                





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011