- 8 - See Collins v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-291. Rule 123 provides that the failure of a party to appear at trial or other hearing may result in an entry of decision against such party.1 We find the facts deemed admitted sufficient to satisfy respondent's burden of proving fraud. The foregoing circumstances and above-pleaded admitted facts clearly establish that petitioner fraudulently underpaid its Federal income taxes for the years at issue. See Smith v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 1049, 1058-1059 (1988), affd. 926 F.2d 1470 (6th Cir. 1991); Doncaster v. Commissioner, supra at 337. Accordingly, we are satisfied that the additions to tax for fraud should be sustained by entry of an order pursuant to Rule 123. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered. 1Rule 123 provides in part: (a) Default: If any party has failed to plead or otherwise proceed as provided by these Rules or as required by the Court, then such party may be held in default by the Court either on motion of another party or on the initiative of the Court. Thereafter, the Court may enter a decision against the defaulting party, upon such terms and conditions as the Court may deem proper, or may impose such sanctions * * * as the Court may deem appropriate. * * *Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011