Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          expense statements identifying the nature of the services that he           
          provided to his clients.  Respondent also asserts that Mr. Jones            
          failed to bill his clients based upon a coherent fee schedule,              
          making it difficult to determine the proper amount of an award of           
          attorney's fees.  Finally, respondent directed the Court's                  
          attention to various materials, including one of Mr. Kersting's             
          so-called Dear Friend letters (dated February 6, 1992), which               
          suggest that a portion of Mr. Jones' fees relates to advice that            
          Mr. Jones provided to his clients regarding "asset protection               
          services"; i.e., bankruptcy advice.  Respondent asserts that such           
          fees were not incurred as a consequence of the Government                   
          misconduct.                                                                 
               Respondent filed a separate objection to Mr. Sticht's                  
          motion.  Respondent contends that an award of attorney's fees               
          under section 6673(a)(2) is not warranted in these cases inasmuch           
          as the Government misconduct in the trial of the test cases was             
          not vexatious and the Government exhibited its institutional good           
          faith by promptly bringing the misconduct to the Court's                    
          attention in June 1992.  Respondent also challenged Mr. Sticht's            
          request for an award of attorney's fees on the ground that Mr.              
          Sticht, like Messrs. Izen and Jones, failed to provide the Court            
          with time sheets or expense statements describing his services to           
          his clients.  Finally, respondent asserts that Mr. Sticht's                 








Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011