- 6 - determinations are erroneous. See Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).4 Petitioner’s argument focuses on the use of the word “contributions” in SECA’s title and relies upon what petitioner claims is its plain meaning. Petitioner’s argument is misplaced. Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines “contribution”, among other things, as “a payment (as a levy or tax) imposed by military, civil, or ecclesiastical authorities [usually] for a special or extraordinary purpose”. Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 252 (10th ed. 1997). The use of the term “contributions” in SECA’s title is consistent with the definition cited above. Self-employment tax is a tax imposed by the United States Government for a special purpose; i.e., to fund Social Security and hospital insurance benefits. The taxation regime established by SECA has been upheld as constitutional. See Cain v. United States, 211 F.2d 375 (5th Cir. 1954); Egan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1980-560, affd. without published opinion (9th Cir. 1982). Section 1401 imposes a tax on income earned from self- employment in order to fund the payment of Social Security and 4Although respondent claimed increased additions to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1) in his answer, as to which he bears the burden of proof, see Rule 142(a), the issue is moot since respondent has conceded that petitioner’s liability for the sec. 6651(a)(1) addition to tax for 1996 and 1997 is lower than that determined in the notice of deficiency.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011