Frank J. & Ann M. Feraco - Page 21




                                       - 21 -                                         

          Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 250-151 (1985); sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income            
          Tax Regs.                                                                   
               In this case, petitioners were completely inexperienced in             
          managing the financial affairs of a business and in operating               
          under the Subchapter S rules.  The Board of Directors decided               
          that Southern Auto's profits should be dispersed to the                     
          stockholders (Frank, Thomas, and Bob) based upon actual dollars             
          received as a percentage of the total.  This allocation was then            
          presented to two different independent accountants, at least one            
          of whom was a Certified Public Accountant, who told petitioners             
          that this was acceptable and that the Board could allocate the              
          profit as a percentage of the actual distributions.  Petitioners,           
          pursuant to this advice, provided the accountant with the actual            
          allocations of the distributions and the other financial                    
          information from Southern Auto.  We find that petitioners                   
          reasonably relied upon the advice they received.  Petitioners had           
          reasonable cause and acted in good faith.  We find for                      


















Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011