Barry Philliip Fiegel - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner was               
          required to report as income certain amounts he received in                 
          taxable year 1996; (2) whether petitioner is liable for self-               
          employment tax on income received in 1996, and entitled to a                
          deduction therefor, as determined by respondent; and (3) whether            
          petitioner is eligible for the earned income credit for 1996.               
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.1              
          The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in               
          Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on the date the petition was filed in              
          this case.                                                                  
               Petitioner timely filed his Federal income tax return for              
          taxable year 1996.  On his return, he reported $5,831 in wages              
          received from OTI, Inc.  Petitioner received, but did not report            
          on his return, $1,605 from Nebraska Keno Operators, Inc., and               
          $8,886 from National Petition Management.                                   
               Respondent issued petitioner a statutory notice of                     
          deficiency dated July 1, 1998.  Respondent’s determination of               
          petitioner's tax liability in the notice of deficiency is                   



          1Both petitioner and counsel for respondent signed the                      
          Stipulation of Facts with attached exhibits.  Petitioner,                   
          however, added a handwritten note stating that “I, Barry Fiegel,            
          say ‘no contest’ or ‘nolo contendre’ to this 3-page proposed                
          Stipulation of Facts. * * * I have no idea whether the enclosed             
          ‘facts’ are true or are not true.”  We will continue to treat the           
          statements made in the document as stipulated, however, because             
          petitioner admitted the veracity of the stipulation at trial.               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011