Andrew Fullman - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               After concessions by petitioner,1 the issue is whether                 
          amounts received from two churches for playing an organ during              
          services are taxable under section 61.  Petitioner resided in               
          Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at the time the petition was filed.             
               During 1997, petitioner received $8,177 from the Oak Grove             
          Baptist Church (Oak Grove) and $3,437 from the Mt. Zion Baptist             
          Church (Mt. Zion) for playing the organ during church services.             
          Oak Grove issued a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, and Mt. Zion           
          issue a Form 1099-MISC to petitioner.  Petitioner did not report            
          any income from either church on his 1997 Federal income tax                
          return.                                                                     
               Petitioner argues that he is a “‘Minister of Music’ and                
          play[s] the organ for the glory of God. * * * God does not want             
          His Church affiliated with the state”.  Even if we accept                   
          petitioner’s statements, we fail to understand why the payments             
          for his services are excludable from gross income.                          
               Section 61(a) provides, inter alia, that “gross income means           
          all income from whatever source derived, including * * * (1)                
          Compensation for services”.  While the Internal Revenue Code does           
          provide limited exclusions from gross income, there is no                   
          exclusion for income received by individuals from a church or               


               1    Petitioner did not report $157 received from the Civil            
          Service Retirement System in 1997.  Respondent determined that              
          the amount was included in gross income and that the additional             
          tax under sec. 72(t) was applicable.  Petitioner does not dispute           
          these determinations.                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011