Estate of Fred O. Godley, Deceased, Fred D. Godley, Administrator CTA - Page 16




                                        - 16 -                                          
          Found. v. United States, 674 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1981); United                 
          States v. Land, 303 F.2d 170 (5th Cir. 1962).                                 
               Petitioner introduced the expert report of Beck prepared for             
          purposes of the present proceeding.  In addition, the parties                 
          stipulated into evidence the expert reports that were prepared                
          for the equitable distribution proceedings.  Finally, Beck,                   
          Dvorak, Kaye, and Keith all testified as expert witnesses at                  
          trial.  Expert opinion sometimes aids the Court in determining                
          valuation; other times, it does not.  See Laureys v.                          
          Commissioner, 92 T.C. 101, 129 (1989).  We evaluate such opinions             
          in light of the demonstrated qualifications of the expert and all             
          other evidence of value in the record.  See Estate of Newhouse v.             
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 193, 217 (1990).  We are not bound,                     
          however, by the opinion of any expert witness when that opinion               
          contravenes our judgment.  See id.  We may accept the opinion of              
          an expert in its entirety, see Buffalo Tool & Die Manufacturing               
          Co. v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 441, 452 (1980), or we may be                    
          selective in the use of any portion thereof, see Parker v.                    
          Commissioner, 86 T.C. 547, 562 (1986).                                        
          Options                                                                       
               We must first decide whether the value of each interest is               
          limited by the option provision contained in each partnership                 
          agreement.  Petitioner claims that the fair market value of each              
          partnership interest is limited to the $10,000 option price, or               
          in the alternative, that the option provision otherwise affects               




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011