- 13 - “passthrough” entity, yet did not provide any evidence of where this income was “passed on” to. Based upon these indicia, we hold that respondent has carried the burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner’s failure to report income for 1993, 1994, and 1995 was fraudulent with the intent to evade tax. Petitioner, on the other hand, has failed to show that any portion of its underpayment was not due to fraud. Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination that petitioner is liable for the penalties for fraud under section 6663(a) for all the years under consideration. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: May 25, 2011