Stephen L. and Doralynn Goodman - Page 3




                                         - 3 -                                          

          1999), the $1,583,365 of discharge of indebtedness income does                
          not result in a basis increase in the Scientific Plastics, Inc.,              
          stock.  In Nelson, we held that an S corporation's shareholder                
          may not increase his basis to reflect the S corporation's                     
          excluded discharge of indebtedness income.  See id.  Petitioners              
          do not attempt to distinguish Nelson, but instead contend that                
          Nelson was decided incorrectly.  This case is indistinguishable               
          from Nelson, and we need not reiterate our analysis.                          
          Accordingly, we hold that the discharge of indebtedness income                
          does not increase petitioners’ stock bases.                                   
               To reflect the foregoing,                                                
                                                   Decisions will be entered            
                                              under Rule 155.                           

























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  

Last modified: May 25, 2011