Harry R. Gross - Page 4




                                         - 4 -                                           

               Petitioner's 1988 balance due was assigned to an IRS revenue              
          officer in Nashville, Tennessee, where petitioner resided at the               
          time.  The revenue officer worked with petitioner to determine                 
          whether petitioner could satisfy his 1988 tax liability.  By                   
          letter dated February 26, 1991, petitioner, among other things                 
          not relevant here, stated that he expected to eliminate his 1988               
          tax liabilities with a loss he expected to report on his 1990 tax              
          return.  On March 27, 1991, the revenue officer closed his                     
          collection file on petitioner's 1988 account, deeming it                       
          uncollectible, after determining petitioner was unable to pay the              
          amount due.  On that same date, petitioner sent the revenue                    
          officer a letter and a copy of petitioner’s 1990 return.                       
               Petitioner filed his 1990 Federal income tax return timely,               
          which reported a loss of $319,820.  However, petitioner did not                
          file a Form 1045 with his 1990 return with respect to the net                  
          operating loss he sustained.                                                   
               In March 1992, petitioner contacted the IRS and learned that              
          he still owed tax, additions to tax, and interest for 1988.  By                
          letter dated May 4, 1992, petitioner requested the revenue                     
          officer to remove the tax, additions to tax, and interest from                 
          his 1988 account as he thought they had been satisfied by his                  
          1990 loss.  The revenue officer, by letter dated June 2, 1992,                 
          responded to petitioner’s letter and provided a summary of                     
          petitioner’s 1988 account balance.  While the summary reflected                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011