- 8 - Consistent with the preceding discussion, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction in this case because of petitioner's failure to file a timely petition with the Court. Accordingly, we will grant respondent's motion to dismiss.2 An order will be entered granting respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. 1(...continued) petition was timely filed. See Lowman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-157. Because the 90-day filing period would have expired on Nov. 22, 1999, the petition was not timely filed. 2 We note that although petitioner cannot pursue his case in this Court, he is not without a remedy. In short, petitioner may pay the tax, file a claim for a refund with the Internal Revenue Service, and if the claim is denied, sue for a refund in the U.S. District Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. See McCormick v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 138, 142 (1970).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011