Michael H. Gulley and Paula M. Gulley - Page 17




                                         - 17 -                                          
          GSD under section 1398(b)(2) and (g) when petitioner filed his                 
          petition in bankruptcy on July 11, 1991, and it held petitioner’s              
          interest in GSD at the end of GSD’s 1991 taxable year, December                
          31, 1991.  Thus, the bankruptcy estate succeeded to petitioner’s               
          share of the 1991 NOL.  See sec. 1398(f).  Petitioner’s transfer               
          of his interest in GSD to the bankruptcy estate was not a change               
          in interest requiring an allocation of his distributive share of               
          GSD’s partnership items between himself and the bankruptcy estate              
          for purposes of section 706(d)(1).                                             
          D.   Whether the GSD Partnership Interest Was Abandoned by the                 
               Bankruptcy Trustee and Reverts to Petitioner                              
               Petitioners contend that petitioner’s interest in GSD was                 
          not administered by the bankruptcy trustee, and thus it reverts                
          to the debtor as though he had not filed a bankruptcy petition.                
          See 11 U.S.C. sec. 554 (West 1988).  Petitioners suggest that 11               
          U.S.C. section 363 (West 1988) lists use, sale, or lease of                    
          property as examples of what is contemplated by a bankruptcy                   
          trustee’s administration of an asset.  Petitioners argue that the              
          bankruptcy trustee did not administer the GSD partnership                      
          interest because he filed no motion to sell, exchange,                         
          distribute, lease, use, or hypothecate the GSD partnership                     
          interest or to otherwise dissolve the partnership.  Petitioners                
          cite In re Dewsnup, 908 F.2d 588 (10th Cir. 1990), for the                     
          proposition that a partnership asset abandoned by a bankruptcy                 
          trustee returns to the debtor (petitioner) as if the partnership               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011