- 6 - be treated by Haas as representing $151,165 in taxable compensation and as an ordinary business expense for DP. Haas’ exchange of his DP stock for the stock in Haas & Associates was to be treated as a tax-free reorganization under sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D). Under the terms of the separation agreement, the 180 client files, the covenant not to compete, and the right to receive consulting services were transferred to Haas individually in exchange for the payment by Haas to DP of $263,500, the indicated total value therefor.2 Until January 1, 1994, Haas carried on two separate accounting practices--one individually and one through Haas & Associates. On January 1, 1994, Haas transferred all of the assets of his individual accounting practice to Haas & Associates. Haas and his wife Angela timely filed their 1993 joint Federal income tax return. On their return, Haas included as ordinary income the $151,000 reflecting the indicated value for the shares of stock in DP that Haas had received.3 2 $10,000 relating to the client files + $190,000 relating to the covenant not to compete + $63,500 relating to the consulting services = $263,500. 3 DP issued to Haas a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, in the amount of $151,000 relating to the additional 8.26-percent stock interest in DP that Haas received even though the value indicated therefor in the separation agreement was $151,165.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011