Daniel Franklin Haines - Page 6




                                         - 6 -                                           
          Habersham-Bey v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 304, 319-320 (1982).                    
          Petitioner failed to do so.  We hold that petitioner is liable                 
          for additions to tax under section 6654(a).                                    
               Respondent moved for a penalty under section 6673.  Under                 
          section 6673, this Court may award a penalty to the United States              
          of up to $25,000 when the proceeding has been instituted or                    
          maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay or if the                       
          taxpayer's position in such proceeding is frivolous or                         
          groundless.  See sec. 6673.  Based on the record, we conclude                  
          that such an award is appropriate in this case.                                
               Petitioner has pursued a frivolous and groundless position                
          throughout this proceeding, and he has refused to cooperate in                 
          the discovery and stipulation process.  Petitioner had previously              
          made frivolous and groundless arguments in the U.S. Bankruptcy                 
          Court for the Western District of Washington (Bankruptcy Court)                
          prior to our proceeding.  The Bankruptcy Court clearly informed                
          petitioner that he is a taxpayer and that he is required to file               
          valid income tax returns.  Petitioner has wasted the time and                  
          resources of two courts.                                                       
               Petitioner knew or should have known that his position was                
          groundless and frivolous, yet he persisted in maintaining this                 
          proceeding primarily to impede the proper workings of our                      
          judicial system and to delay the payment of his Federal income                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011