Donald B. Hawksley - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
               Supplies - $7,108.                                                     
          Nevertheless, the letter concluded by stating that for 1986,                
          respondent was prepared to allow the previously disallowed                  
          Schedule E Barrington Park partnership loss ($26,710) and the               
          gift tax basis in the shares of United Funds, Inc. ($21,365);               
          however, the letter emphasized that “without proper documentation           
          of the above Schedule C expenses, we will be unable to reconsider           
          that portion of our initial examination findings.”                          
               On March 13, 1996, respondent’s Problem Resolution Office              
          sent Mr. Peterson a letter stating that “we haven’t heard from              
          you yet.”                                                                   
               After a response from Mr. Magness on March 20, 1996,                   
          requesting, inter alia, additional time to provide the previously           
          requested information and documentation, respondent’s Problem               
          Resolution Office agreed to extend the time to April 22, 1996.              
          However, Mr. Magness was advised that if such information and               
          documentation were not received by that time, respondent would              
          allow only the Schedule E Barrington Park partnership loss and              
          the gift tax basis in the shares of United Funds, Inc., and no              
          allowance would be made for disallowed Schedule C expenses for              
          either 1985 or 1986.                                                        
               The requested information and documentation was apparently             
          not received.  Accordingly, on May 27, 1996, respondent abated              
          only $23,785.64 of the original $47,294 assessment of the income            






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011