- 10 - Petitioner advances an alternative argument as to why the 3- year look-back period in section 6511(b)(2)(A) applies in the instant case. Petitioner argues that, for purposes of section 6511(a), respondent’s substitute for return for petitioner’s tax year 1996 constitutes a return filed by the taxpayer, here petitioner, on or before April 28, 1999, the date on which respondent issued the notice to her. Consequently, according to petitioner, the 3-year look-back period in section 6511(b)(2)(A) applies in the instant case. Respondent counters that a substi- tute for return prepared by respondent pursuant to section 6020(b)(1) does not constitute a return filed by the taxpayer for purposes of section 6511(a) and that therefore petitioner’s alternative argument should be rejected. We agree with respon- dent. In support of her position that respondent’s substitute for return for petitioner’s tax year 1996 constitutes a return filed by the taxpayer for purposes of section 6511(a), petitioner relies on section 6020(b)(2). Section 6020(b) provides in pertinent part: SEC. 6020. RETURNS PREPARED FOR OR EXECUTED BY SECRETARY. (b) Execution of Return by Secretary.-- (1) Authority of secretary to execute return.–-If any person fails to make any return required by any internal revenue law or regulation made thereunder at the time prescribed therefor * * *, the Secretary shall make such return fromPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011