Debra J. Hord - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          petition within the 90-day period prescribed in section 6213(a).1           
          On October 25, 1999, the Court heard evidence and argument on               
          respondent’s motion.                                                        
          Background                                                                  
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $9,867 in Federal                
          income tax due from petitioner for taxable year 1996.  Respondent           
          mailed to petitioner a statutory notice of deficiency, which                
          shows on its face the date December 29, 1998.  The notice of                
          deficiency was mailed to petitioner’s residence in Pearland,                
          Texas.                                                                      
               On April 5, 1999, petitioner filed a petition for                      
          redetermination with the Court.2  Attached to the petition was a            
          copy of the notice of deficiency.  The petition arrived at the              
          Court in an envelope bearing a private postage meter mark showing           
          a date of March 29, 1999.  The private postage meter mark was               
          canceled by a larger U.S. Postal Service mark, clearly showing              
          the month and year as “MAR 1999”.  The day of the month, however,           
          is only partially printed and appears as the open-looped bottoms            
          of two digits, which respondent contends signify the number “30”.           
          The envelope has attached to it a U.S. Postal Service “CERTIFIED            



               1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to            
          the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax           
          Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                      
               2 When the petition was filed, petitioner resided in                   
          Pearland, Texas.                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011