Delwin D. Houser - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992), affg. 96 T.C. 858, 873 (1991).                  
          Respondent has the burden of proving fraud by clear and                     
          convincing evidence.  See sec. 7454(a); Rule 142(b); Bagby v.               
          Commissioner, 102 T.C. 596, 607 (1994).                                     
               Indicia of fraud include:  (1) Understatements of income;              
          (2) inadequate books and records; (3) failure to file tax                   
          returns; (4) implausible or inconsistent explanations; and                  
          (5) lack of cooperation with tax authorities.  See Bradford v.              
          Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307-308 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C.             
          Memo. 1984-601; Clayton v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 632, 647                  
          (1994); Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 699-700 (1989);              
          Recklitis v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 874, 910 (1988).                         
               Petitioner has not alleged any nontaxable sources of                   
          income, and the roofing business constitutes the likely taxable             
          source of the deposits into the checking account.                           
               With regard to fraudulent intent, the evidence establishes             
          for each year in issue that petitioner realized significant                 
          income that he failed to report, that petitioner failed to                  
          provide to respondent’s agents books and records relating to the            
          roofing business, that petitioner failed to file income tax                 
          returns, that petitioner failed to pay significant tax                      
          liabilities that he owed, that petitioner did not cooperate with            
          respondent, and that petitioner made erroneous tax protester                
          objections to the tax laws.  The evidence establishes that                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011