Jaco L.C., Jay A. Odom, Tax Matters Partner - Page 6




                                         - 6 -                                        
          an affected item, to the extent practicable credit or refund of             
          such overpayment shall be allowed without any requirement that              
          the partner file a claim therefor.  Sec. 6230(d)(5).  An                    
          individual partner may file a claim for refund under section                
          6230(c) if the Secretary fails to make a credit or refund in the            
          amount of any overpayment attributable to the application to the            
          partner of the decision of the Court.                                       
               Accordingly, we shall grant respondent’s Motion To Dismiss             
          For Lack Of Jurisdiction And To Strike with respect to refunds of           
          overpayments to shareholders.                                               
               On the Court’s own motion, we find that there are other                
          portions of petitioner’s petition which must be stricken because            
          of a lack of jurisdiction.  The FPAA was accompanied by an                  
          explanation of examination changes which includes a statement               
          that “Penalties or additions to tax under IRC 6662, which may be            
          applicable at the investor level, are being recommended in the              
          examination of the flow-through entity” and by an “Explanation of           
          Affected Items” which states that “an addition to the tax is                
          charged as provided by Section 6662(a).”  The petition includes             
          allegations contesting the imposition of the accuracy-related               
          penalty.                                                                    
               This Court previously has ruled that for 1995 (and 1996)               
          this Court lacks jurisdiction over the accuracy-related penalty             
          in a partnership-level proceeding and that the penalty may be               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011