Jeff Burger Productions - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

          tion that Banana Moon Trust is the tax matters partner (TMP) for            
          Jeff Burger Productions.  Banana Moon Trust was formed under the            
          laws of the State of Arizona.                                               
               Upon commencement of the examination of the returns filed by           
          Jeff Burger Productions for taxable years 1994 and 1995, respon-            
          dent requested complete copies of the trust documents relating to           
          Banana Moon Trust, the purported TMP for Jeff Burger Productions,           
          as well as other information.  Petitioner refused to provide                
          respondent with the trust documents and other information re-               
          quested.                                                                    
               Respondent’s motion contends in pertinent part:                        
                    14.  There is absolutely no evidence from which                   
               the Court can adduce that Mr. Chisum is the current                    
               trustee of Banana Moon Trust.                                          
                    15.  Petitioner * * * [has] provided no evidence                  
               that the appointment of Mr. Chisum (as trustee) was                    
               valid or authorized under the terms of the trust inden-                
               ture * * *.                                                            
                    16.  * * * petitioner * * * [has] failed to demon-                
               strate that Mr. Chisum was legally appointed as trustee                
               of Banana Moon Trust and therefore, [is] authorized to                 
               act on behalf of Banana Moon Trust (as TMP) and bring                  
               the instant case before this Court.  See T.C. Rule                     
               60(c).                                                                 
                    17.  The capacity of Mr. Chisum to act under                      
               Arizona law and bring the instant suit in this Court,                  
               likewise, has not been established.                                    
               Petitioner filed a response to respondent’s motion in which            
          it asks the Court to deny that motion.  That response asserts in            
          pertinent part:                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011