Stanley Joseph Jennings - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          substantiation.  Petitioner makes no other argument that he is              
          not liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section                   
          6662(a).  We conclude that petitioner is liable for the accuracy-           
          related penalty for each of the years in issue.                             
          C.   Whether Respondent Should Be Sanctioned                                
               Petitioner contends that we should sanction respondent                 
          because he alleges that respondent violated his procedural rights           
          under sections 6001, 6011, 6012(a), and 6703(a), IRS Publication            
          1, “Your Rights as a Taxpayer”, and IRS Privacy Act Notice 609 by           
          failing to explain a document relating to his 1993 tax year                 
          (which is not before the Court) and by refusing to settle this              
          case.  We disagree.  Petitioner has not shown that respondent               
          violated his rights in any way.  We conclude that sanctions are             
          not appropriate on this record.                                             
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                       Decision will be               
                                        entered for respondent.                       


















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  

Last modified: May 25, 2011