Eldon R. Kenseth and Susan M. Kenseth - Page 49




                                        - 49 -                                          
         distinguishable exception,21 memorandum opinions, not properly                 
         regarded as binding precedent.22                                               
              The regular opinions of the Tax Court on which the majority               
         rely are not directly in point.  There is another ground on which              
         Smith v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 135 (1951), revd. on another issue              
         203 F.2d 310 (2d Cir. 1953); Cotnam v. Commissioner, 28 T.C. 947               
         (1957), affd. in  part and revd. in part 263 F.2d 119 (5th Cir.                
         1959); Petersen v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 137 (1962); O'Brien v.                
         Commissioner, 38 T.C. 707 (1962), affd. per curiam 319 F.2d 532                
         (3d Cir. 1963); and Estate of Gadlow v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 975              
         (1968), were decided that distinguishes them from the case at                  
         hand.  Each of these earlier cases applied section 107 of the                  
         1939 Code or a similar provision for relief from high marginal                 
         rates of income tax on bunched receipts in one year (or a                      
         relatively short period) of back pay, compensation from an                     


               21 Bagley v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 396, 418-419 (1995),                 
          affd. on other issues 121 F.3d 393 (8th Cir. 1997), which was not             
          appealed on this issue, held, among numerous other things, that               
          hybrid attorney’s fees (fixed $50-hourly rate and 25-percent                  
          contingency fee), to extent allocable to taxable portion of                   
          awards, were deductible as itemized deductions under sec. 67(a),              
          rather than as offsets in computing gross income.  Stated ground              
          of decision on this issue, not appealed by the taxpayers, was                 
          that fee agreement did not create partnership or joint venture                
          within meaning of sec. 7701(a)(2) between plaintiff-taxpayer and              
          attorney.  See infra pp. 70, 90-97.                                           
               22 See, e.g., Benci-Woodward v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                 
          1998-395; Sinyard v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-364;                       
          Srivastava v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-362; Coady v.                     
          Commissioner, supra; Brewer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-542,             
          affd. without published opinion 172 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1999).                 




Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011