Estate of Emily F. Klauss - Page 5




                                         - 5 -                                          
               Petitioner attached to the estate’s Federal estate tax                   
          return an appraisal of decedent’s minority interest in Green                  
          Light prepared by Clark C. Munroe (Munroe).  Munroe estimated,                
          and petitioner reported on that return, that the fair market                  
          value of decedent’s 184 shares of Green Light stock was                       
          $1,810,000 as of February 1, 1993.                                            
          D.   Notice of Deficiency                                                     
               Respondent determined in the notice of deficiency that the               
          fair market value of decedent’s 184 shares of Green Light stock               
          was $4,080,200.  Respondent now concedes that the value of                    
          decedent’s stock was not more than $2,713,000.                                
                                        OPINION                                         
               The issue for decision is the fair market value of                       
          decedent’s 184 shares of Green Light stock on the day decedent                
          died, February 1, 1993.                                                       
          A.   Fair Market Value                                                        
               Fair market value is the price at which the property would               
          change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller,                    
          neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both                 
          having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts.  See United                
          States v. Cartwright, 411 U.S. 546, 551 (1973); sec. 20.2031-                 
          1(b), Estate Tax Regs.; sec. 25.2512-1, Gift Tax Regs.2  If                   


               2  Petitioner bears the burden of proving that respondent’s              
          determination in the notice of deficiency is erroneous.  See Rule             
          142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011