- 2 - concessions2 the sole issue we must decide is whether petitioners are entitled to the $455,720 casualty loss claimed on their 1994 Federal income tax return. The stipulation of facts and attached exhibits are incorporated herein. The stipulated facts are hereby found. Background When the petition was filed, petitioners resided in Lakeville, Minnesota. In 1994, petitioners were the only partners in the Chateau Deville Partnership. The Chateau Deville Partnership owned a group of apartment buildings located in Slidell, Louisiana. The apartment buildings were damaged by flooding in 1995.3 Before the flood, the apartment buildings' basis was $672,093. The fair market value of the apartment buildings immediately prior to the flood was $2 million. The fair market value of the apartment buildings immediately after the flood was $750,000. Petitioners received insurance proceeds of $767,000 as compensation for the flooding damage to the apartment buildings. 2 Respondent has conceded that petitioners are not liable for the sec. 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty and are entitled to a reduction of capital gains of $28,682, as opposed to the amount of $14,828 stated in the notice of deficiency. 3 We note that the property suffered damage in 1995; however, petitioners assert on brief that the surrounding area was subsequently declared a disaster area by President Clinton allowing the deduction to be taken in 1994 under sec. 165(i). Respondent does not dispute this assertion in his brief, reply brief or mention the issue in the notice of deficiency.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011