- 35 - working capital of $753,620,23 well in excess of the $665,815 shown on the 1986 balance sheet. BVS determined from PCAB’s records that PCAB held notes from Nikita Maggos in the approximate amount of $1,328,110.24 A hypothetical purchaser of 56.7 percent of the shares of PCAB from a hypothetical seller would have relied on PCAB’s financial statements to determine PCAB’s assets. Neither a hypothetical purchaser nor a seller would have any reason to cause PCAB to discharge Nikita Maggos’ debt. A hypothetical purchaser of 56.7 percent of the shares of PCAB would have been in control and would have logically insisted on repayment of Nikita Maggos’ notes. In the instant case, we think the appropriate treatment of the shareholder notes, for valuation purposes, is to treat them consistently with the business records of PCAB as nonoperating assets. BVS’ discounted cash-flow analysis, after making the adjustments detailed above, would result in a value for 100 23“Working capital” in this context is defined as the sum of cash on hand, receivables, inventory, and other current assets less accounts payable and other current liabilities. 24This number is derived by averaging the notes outstanding on Oct. 31, 1986 ($1,054,138), and the notes outstanding on Oct. 31, 1987 ($1,602,082). The “Current Market Indicator Evaluation”, which was prepared by Shircliff contemporaneously with the redemption transaction, shows notes receivable from stockholders as being approximately $1,300,000. We note that Coopers & Lybrand, petitioner’s expert in the District Court litigation, valued the notes at $1,054,138 in its report.Page: Previous 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011