John R. and Lois J. McCarthy - Page 14




                                               - 14 -                                                  
                  4. Expectation That Assets May Appreciate                                            
                  An expectation that assets used in the activity will                                 
            appreciate in value may indicate a profit objective.  See sec.                             
            1.183-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs.                                                            
                  Petitioner contends that the guns he purchased will                                  
            appreciate in value.  This was based on petitioner’s own                                   
            estimation, and he offered no evidence to support his contention                           
            that the value of the guns is sufficient to recoup the                                     
            accumulated losses.  In any event, it would seem that collecting                           
            guns is a different activity from writing about them.                                      
                  5. Past Success in Similar or Dissimilar Activities                                  
                  A taxpayer’s past success in similar or dissimilar                                   
            activities is relevant in determining a profit objective.  See                             
            sec. 1.183-2(b)(5), Income Tax Regs.                                                       
                  Petitioner contends that he was successful as a writer for                           
            Rocketdyne and that he considers himself a professional writer                             
            because of his employment with Rocketdyne.  When employed by                               
            Rocketdyne, petitioner wrote technical or scientific proposals                             
            for the company.  Presumably, petitioner was a skilled and                                 
            talented technical writer.  This is quite different from writing                           
            articles and novels for the public.  Furthermore, petitioner did                           
            not have to market the writing that he performed for Rocketdyne.                           










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011