Charles A. McGee - Page 20




                                               - 20 -                                                  
            The amounts of gross receipts reflected on the Schedules C                                 
            attached to the 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990 returns were $314,424,                          
            $327,852, $287,986, and $711,960, respectively.                                            
                  In addition to these discrepancies, other items of income                            
            were not disclosed to petitioner’s return preparer and were not                            
            reflected on any tax returns.  First, during 1988, 1989, and                               
            1990, certain withdrawals were made from Trust Accounts 1 and 2                            
            that represented taxable income to petitioner.  Second, during                             
            1987 and 1990, certain fees earned by petitioner were not                                  
            deposited into any of the accounts maintained by petitioner in                             
            connection with his law practice.  During 1987 alone, the                                  
            unreported specific items total $634,252, while petitioner                                 
            reported only $314,424 of gross receipts.                                                  
                  Petitioner admits to receiving the unreported income, yet                            
            alleges that the 1987 unreported income items were subsequently                            
            deposited into the Business Account.  Petitioner, however,                                 
            presented no evidence supporting this allegation.  In addition,                            
            these items that were allegedly deposited into petitioner’s                                
            Business Account were never entered into the receipt books of                              
            petitioner’s law practice.  Furthermore, petitioner offered no                             
            credible evidence that any of the unexplained deposits were from                           
            a nontaxable source.  In short, petitioner has not shown that                              
            respondent’s income reconstruction is incorrect.  Accordingly,                             
            respondent’s determinations are sustained.                                                 







Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011